Final call for news for 0.18

[Felipe Contreras]

Tomi Ollila wrote:
> In general these patches:
> 
> id:1398289784-18203-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras at gmail.com
> id:1398289784-18203-3-git-send-email-felipe.contreras at gmail.com
> id:1398289784-18203-4-git-send-email-felipe.contreras at gmail.com
> 
> has something lacking in the commit messages; none of these indicate that
> these are vim patches in the subject line.

Agh, I ported them from my standalone repo and forgot to do that.

> Also NEWS for these changes are missing.

Shouldn't the NEWS be written by the maintainers? In fact, aren't they
the ones that decide if something is worth mentioning in the NEWS or
not?

> I personally don't see these patches being important enough to hinder
> 0.18 release timeline --

Well, if your mails had ever been rejected from vger.kernel.org because
of the format you might see that.

> these patches should just have come earlier...

Yes.

> ... but if you had a good case, fix these things (quickly!) and had
> strong backing from some other notmuch-vim users I could see a small
> chance of these being part of the next release...

All right.

> PS: does vim frontend lack id:message-id feature --

What feature?

-- 
Felipe Contreras