Patches for 0.12

[Jameson Graef Rollins]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:16:01 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon at MIT.EDU> wrote:
> > We had a somewhat lively debate about desirablity of the following
> > patch. My decision is that for now, we avoid changing the behaviour of
> > notmuch, and do apply the patch. We can discuss later deprecating or
> > changing this permissive behaviour. 
> > 
> >    id:"1331385931-1610-1-git-send-email-david at tethera.net"
> 
> Alternatively, can we just require GMime 2.6.7 by applying
>   id:"1331515786-485-1-git-send-email-david at tethera.net"
> instead of
>   id:"1331385931-1610-1-git-send-email-david at tethera.net"
> and
>   id:"1329852935-3019-1-git-send-email-schnouki at schnouki.net"
> ?

I much prefer this solution (i.e. just require GMime 2.6.7 and no
notmuch patches).  I still think we need some sort of coherent approach
for rejecting mbox, but I think it will require a lot more thought.

jamie.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120314/ac3c0b67/attachment.pgp>