[PATCH v4 08/11] cli: Make notmuch-show respect excludes.

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:35:10 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:08:32 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote:
> > On Thu,  2 Feb 2012 17:43:36 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This adds the excludes to notmuch-show.c. We do not exclude when only
> > > a single message (or part) is requested. notmuch-show will output the
> > > exclude information when either text or json format is requested. As
> > > this changes the output from notmuch-show it breaks many tests (in a
> > > trivial and expected fashion).
> > > ---
> > >  notmuch-show.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/notmuch-show.c b/notmuch-show.c
> > > index dec799c..108f13b 100644
> > > --- a/notmuch-show.c
> > > +++ b/notmuch-show.c
> > > @@ -193,10 +193,11 @@ _get_one_line_summary (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message)
> > >  static void
> > >  format_message_text (unused (const void *ctx), notmuch_message_t *message, int indent)
> > >  {
> > > -    printf ("id:%s depth:%d match:%d filename:%s\n",
> > > +    printf ("id:%s depth:%d match:%d excluded:%d filename:%s\n",
> > >  	    notmuch_message_get_message_id (message),
> > >  	    indent,
> > > -	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH),
> > > +	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH) ? 1 : 0,
> > > +	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_EXCLUDED) ? 1 : 0,
> > >  	    notmuch_message_get_filename (message));
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > @@ -212,9 +213,10 @@ format_message_json (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message, unused (int in
> > >      date = notmuch_message_get_date (message);
> > >      relative_date = notmuch_time_relative_date (ctx, date);
> > >  
> > > -    printf ("\"id\": %s, \"match\": %s, \"filename\": %s, \"timestamp\": %ld, \"date_relative\": \"%s\", \"tags\": [",
> > > +    printf ("\"id\": %s, \"match\": %s, \"excluded\": %s, \"filename\": %s, \"timestamp\": %ld, \"date_relative\": \"%s\", \"tags\": [",
> > >  	    json_quote_str (ctx_quote, notmuch_message_get_message_id (message)),
> > >  	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH) ? "true" : "false",
> > > +	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_EXCLUDED) ? "true" : "false",
> > >  	    json_quote_str (ctx_quote, notmuch_message_get_filename (message)),
> > >  	    date, relative_date);
> > >  
> > > @@ -1059,9 +1061,13 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> > >      char *opt;
> > >      const notmuch_show_format_t *format = &format_text;
> > >      notmuch_show_params_t params;
> > > +    const char **search_exclude_tags;
> > > +    size_t search_exclude_tags_length;
> > 
> > Please move these within the if (!no_exclude) block.
> 
> Will do. (I forgot to move them in notmuch-show when doing notmuch-count
> and notmuch-search)
> 
> > >      int mbox = 0;
> > >      int format_specified = 0;
> > >      int i;
> > > +    notmuch_bool_t no_exclude = FALSE;
> > > +    unsigned int j;
> > 
> > Same. Or better yet, reuse i.
> 
> Will do.
> 
> > >      params.entire_thread = 0;
> > >      params.raw = 0;
> > > @@ -1098,6 +1104,8 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> > >  	    params.part = atoi(argv[i] + sizeof ("--part=") - 1);
> > >  	} else if (STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--entire-thread") == 0) {
> > >  	    params.entire_thread = 1;
> > > +	} else if (STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--no-exclude") == 0) {
> > > +	    no_exclude = TRUE;
> > >  	} else if ((STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--verify") == 0) ||
> > >  		   (STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--decrypt") == 0)) {
> > >  	    if (params.cryptoctx == NULL) {
> > > @@ -1167,10 +1175,18 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> > >      if (params.raw && params.part < 0)
> > >  	params.part = 0;
> > >  
> > > +    /* If a single message is requested we do not use search_excludes. */
> > >      if (params.part >= 0)
> > >  	return do_show_single (ctx, query, format, &params);
> > > -    else
> > > +    else {
> > 
> > Nitpick: There's no rule about this, but I do like the style of using
> > braces for both branches if either branch needs them.
> 
> Will fix.
> 
> > > +	if (!no_exclude) {
> > > +	    search_exclude_tags = notmuch_config_get_search_exclude_tags
> > > +		(config, &search_exclude_tags_length);
> > > +	    for (j = 0; j < search_exclude_tags_length; j++)
> > > +		notmuch_query_add_tag_exclude (query, search_exclude_tags[j]);
> > > +	}
> > >  	return do_show (ctx, query, format, &params);
> > > +    }
> > 
> > Hmm, unreachable code below. Why doesn't the compiler complain?
> 
> Yes I wondered about that (id:"20120120171801.GA16740 at mit.edu"): but didn't think I should do anything about
> that in this series.

I'll send patches to fix that along with converting notmuch-show to the
new style argument parsing in a day or two. I didn't like you adding
options to old style parsing, but also didn't think it reasonable to ask
you to fix it in this series. I might have to ask you to rebase if my
patches get in first, though. ;)

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mark
>