[PATCH v4 08/11] cli: Make notmuch-show respect excludes.

[Mark Walters]

On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:08:32 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote:
> On Thu,  2 Feb 2012 17:43:36 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > This adds the excludes to notmuch-show.c. We do not exclude when only
> > a single message (or part) is requested. notmuch-show will output the
> > exclude information when either text or json format is requested. As
> > this changes the output from notmuch-show it breaks many tests (in a
> > trivial and expected fashion).
> > ---
> >  notmuch-show.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/notmuch-show.c b/notmuch-show.c
> > index dec799c..108f13b 100644
> > --- a/notmuch-show.c
> > +++ b/notmuch-show.c
> > @@ -193,10 +193,11 @@ _get_one_line_summary (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message)
> >  static void
> >  format_message_text (unused (const void *ctx), notmuch_message_t *message, int indent)
> >  {
> > -    printf ("id:%s depth:%d match:%d filename:%s\n",
> > +    printf ("id:%s depth:%d match:%d excluded:%d filename:%s\n",
> >  	    notmuch_message_get_message_id (message),
> >  	    indent,
> > -	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH),
> > +	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH) ? 1 : 0,
> > +	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_EXCLUDED) ? 1 : 0,
> >  	    notmuch_message_get_filename (message));
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -212,9 +213,10 @@ format_message_json (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message, unused (int in
> >      date = notmuch_message_get_date (message);
> >      relative_date = notmuch_time_relative_date (ctx, date);
> >  
> > -    printf ("\"id\": %s, \"match\": %s, \"filename\": %s, \"timestamp\": %ld, \"date_relative\": \"%s\", \"tags\": [",
> > +    printf ("\"id\": %s, \"match\": %s, \"excluded\": %s, \"filename\": %s, \"timestamp\": %ld, \"date_relative\": \"%s\", \"tags\": [",
> >  	    json_quote_str (ctx_quote, notmuch_message_get_message_id (message)),
> >  	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH) ? "true" : "false",
> > +	    notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_EXCLUDED) ? "true" : "false",
> >  	    json_quote_str (ctx_quote, notmuch_message_get_filename (message)),
> >  	    date, relative_date);
> >  
> > @@ -1059,9 +1061,13 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >      char *opt;
> >      const notmuch_show_format_t *format = &format_text;
> >      notmuch_show_params_t params;
> > +    const char **search_exclude_tags;
> > +    size_t search_exclude_tags_length;
> 
> Please move these within the if (!no_exclude) block.

Will do. (I forgot to move them in notmuch-show when doing notmuch-count
and notmuch-search)

> >      int mbox = 0;
> >      int format_specified = 0;
> >      int i;
> > +    notmuch_bool_t no_exclude = FALSE;
> > +    unsigned int j;
> 
> Same. Or better yet, reuse i.

Will do.

> >      params.entire_thread = 0;
> >      params.raw = 0;
> > @@ -1098,6 +1104,8 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >  	    params.part = atoi(argv[i] + sizeof ("--part=") - 1);
> >  	} else if (STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--entire-thread") == 0) {
> >  	    params.entire_thread = 1;
> > +	} else if (STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--no-exclude") == 0) {
> > +	    no_exclude = TRUE;
> >  	} else if ((STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--verify") == 0) ||
> >  		   (STRNCMP_LITERAL (argv[i], "--decrypt") == 0)) {
> >  	    if (params.cryptoctx == NULL) {
> > @@ -1167,10 +1175,18 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >      if (params.raw && params.part < 0)
> >  	params.part = 0;
> >  
> > +    /* If a single message is requested we do not use search_excludes. */
> >      if (params.part >= 0)
> >  	return do_show_single (ctx, query, format, &params);
> > -    else
> > +    else {
> 
> Nitpick: There's no rule about this, but I do like the style of using
> braces for both branches if either branch needs them.

Will fix.

> > +	if (!no_exclude) {
> > +	    search_exclude_tags = notmuch_config_get_search_exclude_tags
> > +		(config, &search_exclude_tags_length);
> > +	    for (j = 0; j < search_exclude_tags_length; j++)
> > +		notmuch_query_add_tag_exclude (query, search_exclude_tags[j]);
> > +	}
> >  	return do_show (ctx, query, format, &params);
> > +    }
> 
> Hmm, unreachable code below. Why doesn't the compiler complain?

Yes I wondered about that (id:"20120120171801.GA16740 at mit.edu"): but didn't think I should do anything about
that in this series.

Thanks

Mark