[PATCH v3 2/2] search: Support automatic tag exclusions

[Pieter Praet]

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:09:30 +0100, Xavier Maillard <xavier at maillard.im> wrote:
> Hey Pieter,
> 

Hi!

> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter at praet.org> wrote:
> > Nice feature!  I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> > *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
> 
> Adding a 'deleted' tag does not mean there will be a delete/purge
> process ;) (currently I got 5k messages with the tag deleted ;). 
> 

Very true, that's why I put quotes around "delete".

Deleting email for real is *so* old-fashioned... :D ;)

> > Nitpicking:
> > 
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> >   So I'd like to suggest replacing all occurences of "auto_exclude_tags"
> >   with "search_exclude_tags" (and simply "exclude_tags" in the args to
> >   `_config_get_list' and `_config_set_list', of course).
> 
> +1
>  
> >   Unfortunately, this would also partially invalidate your recent NEWS
> >   submission [2].
> > 
> > - If the 'search.exclude_tags' option is missing from the config file,
> >   its value is automatically set to "deleted;spam;", which probably isn't
> >   a sane default.  Luckily, you've already provided the solution [3].
> 
> I am against doing something /unsafe/ in the user's back. If there is no
> option set intentionnaly by the user, there is nothing notmuch should
> do -i.e no exclusion -
> 

Absolutely.  Actually, that's *exactly* what I meant.

I thought that would be pretty clear, but perhaps it wasn't.
I've reworded some of the commit messages, and will pay more
attention to it in the future.

> > - To make new users aware of the config option's existence, we should
> >   prompt them to configure it during setup.
> 
> +1
> 
> /Xavier

Thanks for your input!


Peace

-- 
Pieter