[PATCH 1/2] test: add check for <expected> filename argument for test_expect_equal_file
tomi.ollila at iki.fi
Sat Feb 4 00:28:23 PST 2012
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:04:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
> > before I saw this new series. I do now like your original proposal
> > better, since it shows the diff based the names the caller provides,
> > which I now agree is probably the clearest and most robust solution.
> > The second patch in this series could still go through, though, no
> > matter what version of the change to test_expect_equal_file we go with.
> Actually, we can do both: check file name for consistent diff order
> (from expected to actual) and use file names that the caller provides.
> What do you think?
More information about the notmuch