[PATCH 1/2] test: add check for <expected> filename argument for test_expect_equal_file
Jameson Graef Rollins
jrollins at finestructure.net
Fri Feb 3 13:24:53 PST 2012
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:04:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, we can do both: check file name for consistent diff order
> (from expected to actual) and use file names that the caller provides.
> What do you think?
I'm not sure it's worth it, but I suppose that's fine.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the notmuch