[PATCH] doc: field processor support now always included, adjust manual pages

[David Bremner]

Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila at iki.fi> writes:

> The features that require field processor support, are now just
> documented w/o mentioning **Xapian Field Processors**' is needed
> for those.
>
> Replaced "compact" and "field_processor" with "retry_lock" in
> build_with config option, as it is currently the only one that
> is optionally excluded. The former 2 are now documented as
> features always included.
>
> Dropped one 'we' "passive" in notmuch-search-terms.rst. It was the
> only one, and inconsistent with rest of the documentation in that
> file.
>
> Dropped message about conditional open-ended ranges support, as
> those are now always supported.

thanks for that work Tomi. I've included it in the latest release
candidate.

d