performance problems with notmuch new
Don Zickus
dzickus at redhat.com
Mon Apr 20 08:25:19 PDT 2020
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 05:29:13PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Don Zickus <dzickus at redhat.com> writes:
>
> >> runs in about 30s here (i7 4770 / SSD). Replacing --small with --medium
> >> takes about 10M (so a superlinear slowdown in wall clock time, since
> >> that represents a 10x scale-up in the corpus size.).
> >
> > Hmm, for me --small was 35s and --medium was 32 minutes. This is on a
> > i7-9750H / nvme. I would expect numbers similar to yours.
>
> I did another few tests test for --medium and they all take 7-9 minutes,
> depending what else is going on on the machine.
> Here's my breakdown of times (unfortunately a bit of hand editing is
> needed to clean up the warnings)
Sorry for the delay. I re-ran the test today and see similar numbers to
yours now. Roughly 6m30s per run (3 runs).
T00-new.sh: Testing notmuch new [0.4 medium]
Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B)
Initial notmuch new 61.86 59.13 2.53 228124 2024/1087672
notmuch new #2 0.01 0.00 0.00 9136 0/160
notmuch new #3 0.00 0.00 0.00 9068 0/8
notmuch new #4 0.00 0.00 0.00 8940 0/8
notmuch new #5 0.00 0.00 0.00 9060 0/8
notmuch new #6 0.00 0.00 0.00 8932 0/8
new (7500 mv) 44.76 32.67 12.02 186156 0/541024
new (7500 mv back) 47.82 34.81 12.91 187240 0/500000
new (7500 cp) 26.41 20.06 6.28 183448 0/378192
T01-dump-restore.sh: Testing dump and restore [0.4 medium]
Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B)
3.35 1.82 1.31 11992 624/31976
dump * 0.60 0.57 0.02 11356 0/4344
restore * 0.69 0.62 0.06 9064 0/0
T02-tag.sh: Testing tagging [0.4 medium]
Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B)
tag * +new_tag 39.96 24.99 14.74 80048 16/282944
tag * +existing_tag 0.00 0.00 0.00 8968 0/0
tag * -existing_tag 29.98 18.18 11.70 20040 0/208264
tag * -missing_tag 0.00 0.00 0.00 9036 0/0
T03-reindex.sh: Testing reindexing [0.4 medium]
Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B)
reindex * 40.56 33.46 7.02 228908 0/459240
reindex * 39.91 33.10 6.75 223768 112/378824
reindex * 40.04 33.10 6.89 223724 0/334824
T04-thread-subquery.sh: Testing thread subqueries [0.4 medium]
Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B)
search thread:{} ... 0.29 0.26 0.02 23256 0/24
search thread:{} ... 0.27 0.25 0.02 23296 0/24
search thread:{} ... 0.29 0.27 0.02 23192 0/24
The only thing I can think of is my fstrim service runs 1x / week on Monday
at midnight and maybe that helped clean things up?? Perhaps I should
increase that frequency or run it manually when things go bad.
Thanks for the feedback!
Cheers,
Don
More information about the notmuch
mailing list