Weird tagging issue

[David Bremner]

Brian May <brian at linuxpenguins.xyz> writes:

> Hmmmm. Maybe the References header is bad. I see a number of emails in
> this thread referencing "pr-wspdigital/bupaoshc/88 at bitbucket.org", e.g.:
>
> === cut ===
> References: <pr-wspdigital/bupaoshc/88 at bitbucket.org>
>  <prcomment-140582662 at bitbucket.org>
>
> References: <pr-wspdigital/bupaoshc/88 at bitbucket.org>
>
> References: <pr-wspdigital/bupaoshc/88 at bitbucket.org>
>  <pr-wspdigital/bupaoshc/88 at bitbucket.org>
> === cut ===
>
> But "pr-wspdigital/bupaoshc/88 at bitbucket.org" doesn't have any
> information uniquely identifying a particular message for PR #88, and
> furthermore I don't see any message ids that look like this in this
> thread.
>
> I could imagine bad references might be confusing notmuch?


If you still have the messages, maybe you could try the attached script
to visualize the reference structure.

I think dkg and I agreed a few years ago we should ship is as one of our
devel tools, but then I didn't follow through. So I'd be interested in
knowing if it works for you.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: draw-thread
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 912 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20200322/29c5a409/attachment.obj>