On properties and the notmuch CLI
marmstrong at google.com
Sun Feb 17 11:35:19 PST 2019
I see that notmuch supports a tag-like concept called a property. They
seem to differ from tags in three ways:
(a) they aren't shown as user visible "tags", so they can be set on
messages without confusing users with message specific metadata
that is not related to how they want to classify their mail.
(b) they are key/value pairs, not merely a tag.
(c) it is not possible to set or modify properties from the command
First, a confirming question: it is possible to efficiently search for
all messages that set a given property 'P' with a search for:
True? Are queries like these any more efficient than tag doing a prefix
regex search over tags? By this I mean, does the Xapian side keep an
efficient index of all messages that have at least one property "P"?
Second, a question: is there any possibility of relaxing restriction (c)
above? My rationale is this: I'd like it to be possible to write
notmuch "extensions" without binding to the notmuch C API (which feels
quite low level, and an installation point of friction for those who
might want to use the extension). I'd like, for example, to be able to
write fully capable extension logic in Emacs itself (let's ignore Emacs
C "modules" for now). Currently, I am writing code that interacts with
notmuch from Go, and while there are some Go bindings, using them is an
extra level of complexity I'd rather avoid.
Concrete use case ideas:
- were someone to write a fully functional Gnus backend (nnnotmuch?),
it would be useful to store Gnus metadata directly in notmuch itself
(e.g. the message numbers knows to Gnus itself). I don't have a full
design for this, nor do I intend to do it, but the *idea* of doing
this feels very much like what Free Software is all about enabling.
- were someone (me) writing a Go program that used the GMail API to
sync messages to notmuch, I'd love to be able to set properties on
messages at "notmuch insert" time. This would let me leverage the
notmuch database instead of having to resort to hacks (like avoiding
"notmuch insert" entirely, and playing games with filename encoding
schemes to encode the same data with the message).
As far as the risk of property name collisions, perhaps encourage an
x-<project>- prefix convention for all properties not registered with
the notmuch project? That seems to have served well enough for email
More information about the notmuch