Long delay when opening signed emails
Michal Sojka
sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz
Tue Jan 30 12:47:47 PST 2018
On Tue, Jan 30 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Michal--
>
> On Tue 2018-01-30 17:17:54 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I experience annoyingly long delay, when opening some signed emails in
>> Emacs. This is likely related to the following lines appearing in my
>> log when opening the email:
>>
>> Jan 30 17:07:46 dirmngr[7526]: no CRL available for issuer id A401B7A860C859FEA90E1A7EEE2BAF37C7FB918F
>> Jan 30 17:08:06 dirmngr[7526]: resolving 'crl3.digicert.com' failed: Server indicated a failure
>> Jan 30 17:08:06 dirmngr[7526]: can't connect to 'crl3.digicert.com': host not found
>> Jan 30 17:08:06 dirmngr[7526]: error retrieving 'http://crl3.digicert.com/TERENAeSciencePersonalCA3.crl': Server indicated a failure
>> Jan 30 17:08:06 dirmngr[7526]: crl_fetch via DP failed: Server indicated a failure
>> Jan 30 17:08:06 dirmngr[7526]: command 'ISVALID' failed: Server indicated a failure
>>
>> I don't understand why resolving crl3.digicert.com fails, because it
>> works from command line.
>
> I think the e-mail in question is S/MIME-signed. is that right?
Yes, that's correct.
> It looks like dirmngr is having some problems with network connectivity
> -- perhaps it has the wrong information about DNS resolvers?
>
> as a workaround, have you tried terminating dirmngr to let it restart
> when needed? you can do that with:
>
> gpgconf --kill dirmngr
>
> (it should respawn automatically as needed)
That didn't help.
>> Any suggestions how to solve the failure or at least to get rid of the
>> delay?
>
> Apart from the workaround described above, if you decide that you'd
> rather avoid doing CRL checks in general (you might want that to avoid
> metadata leakage at least), you could put "disable-crl-checks" on its
> own line in ~/.gnupg/gpgsm.conf
Perfect, that prevents the delays.
> See also https://dev.gnupg.org/T3348 -- i'm asking upstream to default
> to False there.
Hmm, now I see that my problem is probably the same as in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842291 referenced from
your GPG bug report.
Thank you.
-Michal
More information about the notmuch
mailing list