[PATCH v3 15/16] added notmuch_message_reindex
David Bremner
david at tethera.net
Sun Feb 28 06:52:03 PST 2016
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> writes:
> + const char *autotags[] = {
> + "attachment",
> + "encrypted",
> + "signed",
> + "index-decrypted",
> + "index-decryption-failed" };
Hmm. Is this really the only place these values are needed? That's a bit
surprising to me.
> + /* cache tags and filenames */
> + tags = notmuch_message_get_tags(message);
> + filenames = notmuch_message_get_filenames(message);
> + orig_filenames = notmuch_message_get_filenames(message);
> +
> + /* walk through filenames, removing them until the message is gone */
> + for ( ; notmuch_filenames_valid (filenames);
> + notmuch_filenames_move_to_next (filenames)) {
> + filename = notmuch_filenames_get (filenames);
What's the expected lifetime of the tags, filenames, and orig_filenames
lists? I guess they live until message dies. Are we expecting message to
die fairly quickly in the usual case?
> +
> + /* re-add the filenames with the associated indexopts */
> + for (; notmuch_filenames_valid (orig_filenames);
> + notmuch_filenames_move_to_next (orig_filenames)) {
> + filename = notmuch_filenames_get (orig_filenames);
> +
> + status = notmuch_database_add_message_with_indexopts(notmuch,
> + filename,
> + indexopts,
> + readded ? NULL : &newmsg);
I guess you thought about this already, but I take it you made an
intentional choice to (attempt to) reindex all the files rather than use
_notmuch_message_add_file_name?
More information about the notmuch
mailing list