nmbug in the Debian packages?
W. Trevor King
wking at tremily.us
Sat Feb 13 14:02:50 PST 2016
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 02:17:44PM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:33:10AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> >> We can include it in /usr/bin along and install a proper man page…
> >
> > I'm happy to write up a man page. Do you want it in a separate
> > directory from nmbug-status / notmuch-report [1]? Do you want to
> > rename nmbug to something notmuch-* namespaced?
>
> I guess if we're going to treat it as a first class citizen, then
> yeah, it should be in the notmuch- namespace.
I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1]. Does that sound right? Or do
folks prefer another name?
> It would also need some tests.
In tests/, or devel/dtag/tests? If the latter, how should I handle
the test framework? Symlinks to the main tests/? Copies? Sharness
submodule? Other ideas?
> I'm not sure how (or if) to address the problem that most notmuch
> commands are actually invoked via the main binary, but I don't think
> we have any logic to transform "notmuch foo" to a call to an
> external binary notmuch-foo.
That seems like something that could be handled independently. If
folks want to set it up, adjusting the !command handler in notmuch.c's
main() or adjusting find_command to fall back to “this is probably an
external command” seem doable.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: id:20151231202815.GL3680 at odin.tremily.us
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/21535/focus=21536
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20160213/5c089d2e/attachment.sig>
More information about the notmuch
mailing list