[PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

[W. Trevor King]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:05:41AM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I
> wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic
> i.e. is invading that "namespace". If no one else has the same
> feeling (or the feeling is just wrong (or insignificant)) then this
> can be forgotten :D

For what it's worth, I don't have any ‘rst-*’ commands on my system.
I do have ‘rst2*’ commands, and an ‘rstpep2html.py’.  I'm happy to
rename to whatever, but rst-man2any.py was the best that I could think
of following the texi2any pattern.

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140713/416b67d1/attachment.pgp>