notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem

[David Bremner]

David Bremner <david at tethera.net> writes:

> Is it correct that the statically linked version (notmuch) worked OK but
> the dynamically linked version (notmuch-shared) failed? That's
> consistent with what I observe on Debian, it's just that here the
> dynamically linked version falls back on the canonicalize_file_name in
> glibc, hiding the error.

Actually I'm wrong about this part. or at least I don't know how to test
this on a glibc based system. My suggested test with nm is bogus, since
all symbols from libnotmuch.so will show up the same way.

d