[PATCH 2/3] doc: configure detection of sphinx and rst2man
David Bremner
david at tethera.net
Mon Mar 10 19:18:28 PDT 2014
Because sphinx-build does not provide a convenient way of listing
which builders exist, and some people actually have pre 1.0 sphinx, we
try loading a relevant python module.
Currently the assumption is that no python in path -> no sphinx-build
in path.
---
configure | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 2eaed4a..10356e7 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -393,6 +393,27 @@ else
have_emacs=0
fi
+printf "Checking if sphinx is available and supports nroff output... "
+if hash sphinx-build > /dev/null 2>&1 && python -m sphinx.writers.manpage > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
+ printf "Yes.\n"
+ have_sphinx=1
+ have_rst2man=0
+else
+ printf "No (falling back to rst2man).\n"
+ have_sphinx=0
+
+ printf "Checking if rst2man is available... "
+ if rst2man -V > /dev/null 2>&1; then
+ printf "Yes.\n"
+ have_rst2man=1
+ else
+ printf "No (so will not install man pages).\n"
+ have_rst2man=0
+ fi
+fi
+
+
+
libdir_in_ldconfig=0
printf "Checking which platform we are on... "
@@ -759,6 +780,12 @@ emacsetcdir=${EMACSETCDIR}
# Whether there's an emacs binary available for byte-compiling
HAVE_EMACS = ${have_emacs}
+# Whether there's a sphinx-build binary available for building documentation
+HAVE_SPHINX=${have_sphinx}
+
+# Whether there's a rst2man binary available and used for building documentation
+HAVE_RST2MAN=${have_rst2man}
+
# The directory to which desktop files should be installed
desktop_dir = \$(prefix)/share/applications
--
1.8.5.3
More information about the notmuch
mailing list