[PATCH v3 0/3] Clean up reply's encoding story
David Bremner
david at tethera.net
Sat Aug 17 08:21:55 PDT 2013
Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> writes:
>
> 'make test' now gives me:
>
> FAIL Reply with RFC 2047-encoded headers
> --- reply.12.expected 2013-08-17 11:57:31.047782938 +0000
> +++ reply.12.output 2013-08-17 11:57:31.047782938 +0000
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite at notmuchmail.org>
> -Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?b?4N/n?=
> +Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?B?4N/n?=
> To: =?UTF-8?b?4piD?= <snowman at example.com>
> In-Reply-To: <msg-012 at notmuch-test-suite>
> References: <msg-012 at notmuch-test-suite>
>
> I'm using libgmime 2.6.16-1 from Debian testing.
>
Oh hmm. now that I upgrade to 2.6.16-1 I see the same thing. It seems
like something changed in gmime. I think the RFC specifies that ?b is
equivalent to ?B as an encoding marker, so maybe we should normalize
before comparing?
d
More information about the notmuch
mailing list