[PATCH] lib: Add a new prefix "list" to the search-terms syntax
David Bremner
david at tethera.net
Mon Apr 8 14:56:26 PDT 2013
"Alexey I. Froloff" <raorn at raorn.name> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 08:54:59AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> On the other hand, _notmuch_message_gen_terms does return a status. I
>> agree that currently this status is not useful, but that could change in
>> the future. I also agree that the existing code does the same thing in
>> a few places, but I think it's better not to introduce more.
> Well, this is an adaptation of earlier patch, posted in this list
> some time ago.
Sure, no blame attaches. But somebody still needs to fix the patch or
convince us it doesn't need fixing.
> Personally I see no reason in indexing list description.
That's an independent question. I guess there is the question of how
much overhead this introduces into
>> Any objections to the list: syntax? The only issue I see is that at
>> some point we will probably add a generic header search syntax, and this
>> implicitly says list-id is more important/common than other headers.
> Actual list ID differs from List-Id header value. I can't give
> an example of other message header with similar syntax other from
> From/To/Cc, but those headers already specially processed.
OK, that part seems relatively convincing to me.
d
More information about the notmuch
mailing list