the future of notmuch-vim?

[Charlie Allom]

If Felipe is interested in maintaining the Vim plugin, I vote it should
be replaced with his Ruby version.

Please don't explain why you think emacs is better than vim.

  C.

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:34:48PM -0600, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Quoting Felipe Contreras (2013-04-03 10:09:39)
> >> ...
> >> What you prefer is irrelevant; it's relevant only for you, that's why it's
> >> called a *preference*, the rest of us prefer different things.
> >
> > Never mind preferences, I think originally, this thread was about dropping
> > *support* for the *original* vim plugin that lives in notmuch/contrib.
> > I think we can all agree that this is reasonable.
>
> The reasons for dropping the original vim script are exactly the same
> reasons why it should be replaced with the ruby version.
>
> > This should not keep you from hacking on your script, hosting
> > it whereever you like and support it.
> > For me, one of the charms of notmuch is exactly this extensibility.
>
> Bpth are "my" scripts. I'm supposed to be the maintainer of the vim
> script and I have commit access.
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch at notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

--
 +442077294797 (Office)
 +442031379505 (DDI)
 http://mediasp.com/