[Patch v2 17/17] tag-util: optimization of tag application

[david at tethera.net]

From: David Bremner <bremner at debian.org>

The idea is not to bother with restore operations if they don't change
the set of tags. This is actually a relatively common case.

In order to avoid fancy datastructures, this method is quadratic in
the number of tags; at least on my mail database this doesn't seem to
be a big problem.
---
 notmuch-tag.c |    2 +-
 tag-util.c    |   59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/notmuch-tag.c b/notmuch-tag.c
index 8a8af0b..e4fca67 100644
--- a/notmuch-tag.c
+++ b/notmuch-tag.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ tag_query (void *ctx, notmuch_database_t *notmuch, const char *query_string,
 	 notmuch_messages_valid (messages) && ! interrupted;
 	 notmuch_messages_move_to_next (messages)) {
 	message = notmuch_messages_get (messages);
-	tag_op_list_apply (message, tag_ops, flags);
+	tag_op_list_apply (message, tag_ops, flags | TAG_FLAG_PRE_OPTIMIZED);
 	notmuch_message_destroy (message);
     }
 
diff --git a/tag-util.c b/tag-util.c
index 287cc67..2bb8355 100644
--- a/tag-util.c
+++ b/tag-util.c
@@ -111,6 +111,62 @@ message_error (notmuch_message_t *message,
     fprintf (stderr, "Status: %s\n", notmuch_status_to_string (status));
 }
 
+static int
+makes_changes (notmuch_message_t *message,
+	       tag_op_list_t *list,
+	       tag_op_flag_t flags)
+{
+
+    int i;
+
+    notmuch_tags_t *tags;
+    notmuch_bool_t changes = FALSE;
+
+    /* First, do we delete an existing tag? */
+    changes = FALSE;
+    for (tags = notmuch_message_get_tags (message);
+	 ! changes && notmuch_tags_valid (tags);
+	 notmuch_tags_move_to_next (tags)) {
+	const char *cur_tag = notmuch_tags_get (tags);
+	int last_op =  (flags & TAG_FLAG_REMOVE_ALL) ? -1 : 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < list->count; i++) {
+	    if (strcmp (cur_tag, list->ops[i].tag) == 0) {
+		last_op = list->ops[i].remove ? -1 : 1;
+	    }
+	}
+
+	changes = (last_op == -1);
+    }
+    notmuch_tags_destroy (tags);
+
+    if (changes)
+	return TRUE;
+
+    /* Now check for adding new tags */
+    for (i = 0; i < list->count; i++) {
+	notmuch_bool_t exists = FALSE;
+
+	for (tags = notmuch_message_get_tags (message);
+	     notmuch_tags_valid (tags);
+	     notmuch_tags_move_to_next (tags)) {
+	    const char *cur_tag = notmuch_tags_get (tags);
+	    if (strcmp (cur_tag, list->ops[i].tag) == 0) {
+		exists = TRUE;
+		break;
+	    }
+	}
+	notmuch_tags_destroy (tags);
+
+	/* the following test is conservative, it's ok to think we
+	 * make changes when we don't */
+	if ( ! exists && ! list->ops[i].remove )
+	    return TRUE;
+    }
+    return FALSE;
+
+}
+
 notmuch_status_t
 tag_op_list_apply (notmuch_message_t *message,
 		   tag_op_list_t *list,
@@ -121,6 +177,9 @@ tag_op_list_apply (notmuch_message_t *message,
     notmuch_status_t status = 0;
     tag_operation_t *tag_ops = list->ops;
 
+    if (! (flags & TAG_FLAG_PRE_OPTIMIZED) && ! makes_changes (message, list, flags))
+	return NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS;
+
     status = notmuch_message_freeze (message);
     if (status) {
 	message_error (message, status, "freezing message");
-- 
1.7.10.4