[PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers

[Peter Wang]

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:27:23 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Output Reply-To headers when present in a message.
> > These were missing in text and json output formats.
> 
> I don't see why the Reply-To header is needed, given that we are
> constructing reply templates, but I guess if someone thinks it's needed
> I don't see much harm in including it.

I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply.

Peter