[PATCH v2 3/5] cli: modify mime_node_context to use the new notmuch_crypto_t
Austin Clements
amdragon at MIT.EDU
Fri May 18 12:09:48 PDT 2012
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on May 18 at 10:32 am:
> This simplifies some more interfaces and gets rid of another #ifdef.
> ---
> mime-node.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mime-node.c b/mime-node.c
> index 183ff5d..3dda900 100644
> --- a/mime-node.c
> +++ b/mime-node.c
> @@ -33,12 +33,7 @@ typedef struct mime_node_context {
> GMimeMessage *mime_message;
>
> /* Context provided by the caller. */
> -#ifdef GMIME_ATLEAST_26
> - GMimeCryptoContext *cryptoctx;
> -#else
> - GMimeCipherContext *cryptoctx;
> -#endif
> - notmuch_bool_t decrypt;
> + notmuch_crypto_t *crypto;
> } mime_node_context_t;
>
> static int
> @@ -113,8 +108,7 @@ mime_node_open (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message,
> goto DONE;
> }
>
> - mctx->cryptoctx = crypto->gpgctx;
> - mctx->decrypt = crypto->decrypt;
> + mctx->crypto = crypto;
>
> /* Create the root node */
> root->part = GMIME_OBJECT (mctx->mime_message);
> @@ -190,7 +184,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
>
> /* Handle PGP/MIME parts */
> if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_ENCRYPTED (part)
> - && node->ctx->cryptoctx && node->ctx->decrypt) {
> + && node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx && node->ctx->crypto->decrypt) {
> if (node->nchildren != 2) {
> /* this violates RFC 3156 section 4, so we won't bother with it. */
> fprintf (stderr, "Error: %d part(s) for a multipart/encrypted "
> @@ -203,10 +197,10 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
> #ifdef GMIME_ATLEAST_26
> GMimeDecryptResult *decrypt_result = NULL;
> node->decrypted_child = g_mime_multipart_encrypted_decrypt
> - (encrypteddata, node->ctx->cryptoctx, &decrypt_result, &err);
> + (encrypteddata, node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx, &decrypt_result, &err);
> #else
> node->decrypted_child = g_mime_multipart_encrypted_decrypt
> - (encrypteddata, node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
> + (encrypteddata, node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx, &err);
> #endif
> if (node->decrypted_child) {
> node->decrypt_success = node->verify_attempted = TRUE;
> @@ -224,7 +218,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
> (err ? err->message : "no error explanation given"));
> }
> }
> - } else if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part) && node->ctx->cryptoctx) {
> + } else if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part) && node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx) {
> if (node->nchildren != 2) {
> /* this violates RFC 3156 section 5, so we won't bother with it. */
> fprintf (stderr, "Error: %d part(s) for a multipart/signed message "
> @@ -233,7 +227,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
> } else {
> #ifdef GMIME_ATLEAST_26
> node->sig_list = g_mime_multipart_signed_verify
> - (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
> + (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx, &err);
> node->verify_attempted = TRUE;
>
> if (!node->sig_list)
> @@ -249,7 +243,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
> * In GMime 2.6, they're both non-const, so we'll be able
> * to clean up this asymmetry. */
> GMimeSignatureValidity *sig_validity = g_mime_multipart_signed_verify
> - (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
> + (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto.gpgctx, &err);
This should be crypto->gpgctx.
> node->verify_attempted = TRUE;
> node->sig_validity = sig_validity;
> if (sig_validity) {
More information about the notmuch
mailing list