[PATCH 6/7] ruby: Use notmuch_database_destroy instead of notmuch_database_close

[Austin Clements]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Justus Winter <4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Quoting Felipe Contreras (2012-04-23 14:36:33)
>> I don't think this is the right approach. If database_destroy truly
>> destroys the object, then we would want to do it only at garbage
>> collection, when it's not accessible any more. What if I want to
>> re-use the database from the Ruby code?
>> 
>> This would probably be better:
>> 
>>[...]
>
> You're probably right, I don't know the ruby bindings at all, I just
> wanted to preserve the old behavior. You are welcome to refine the
> ruby bindings later (or maintain them, I *believe* they are
> unmaintained, the last change was back in october 2011), but let's get
> this patch series in first.

I just marked this series ready, but I wasn't clear on what the
conclusion here was.  Feel free to mark it moreinfo again if it's not
actually ready (maybe mark just this patch?  it's a bit confusing since
the patches aren't quite all together.)