[PATCH 4/5] cli: move show to the new --exclude= option naming scheme.

Mark Walters markwalters1009 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 18 10:30:31 PDT 2012


On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:51:20 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon at MIT.EDU> wrote:
> Quoth Mark Walters on Mar 15 at  6:42 pm:
> > This moves show to the --exclude=(true|false|flag) naming
> > scheme. When `exclude' is false or flag show returns all threads
> > that match including those that only match in an excluded message, the
> > difference being whether excluded messages are flagged excluded.
> > 
> > When exclude=true the behaviour depends on whether --entire-threads
> 
> s/--entire-threads/--entire-thread/

Will fix.

> > is set. If it is not set then show only returns the messages which
> > match and are not excluded. If it is set then show returns all
> > messages in these threads flagging the excluded messages. The
> 
> Parse error.

Will try and reword.

> > rationale is that it is awkward to use a thread with some missing
> > messages.
> > ---
> >  man/man1/notmuch-show.1 |   16 ++++++++++++++--
> >  notmuch-client.h        |    1 +
> >  notmuch-show.c          |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/man/man1/notmuch-show.1 b/man/man1/notmuch-show.1
> > index d75d971..801b7f1 100644
> > --- a/man/man1/notmuch-show.1
> > +++ b/man/man1/notmuch-show.1
> > @@ -130,9 +130,21 @@ content.
> >  
> >  .RS 4
> >  .TP 4
> > -.B \-\-no-exclude
> > +.BR \-\-exclude=(true|false|flag)
> > +
> > +Specify whether to omit threads only matching search.tag_exclude from
> > +the search results (the default) or not. The extra option
> > +.B flag
> > +includes these messages but marks them with the excluded flag.
> > +
> > +If --entire-thread is specified then complete threads are returned
> > +regardless (with the excluded flag being set when appropriate) but
> > +threads that only match in an excluded message are not returned when
> > +.B --exclude=true.
> 
> I found this a bit confusing.  There are two orthogonal things going
> on here: what happens to excluded messages and what happens to
> fully-excluded threads.  Is the following table accurate?
> 
>          --entire-thread=false
>       excl. messages   excl. threads
> true       omit            omit
> false    include         include
> flag   include,flag      include
> 
>          --entire-thread=true
>       excl. messages   excl. threads
> true   include,flag        omit
> false    include         include
> flag   include,flag      include

This table is accurate.

> (My reasoning: --exclude=false is equivalent to not having any
> excludes configured, --exclude=true omits excluded messages from the
> seed set and filters them in show_messages, --exclude=flag does not
> exclude messages from the seed set nor filter them in show_messages.)
> 
> If this is right, then what's the point of having both false and flag
> for show?  I'm pretty sure their performance will be
> indistinguishable.

I included the three options partly for completeness, partly to be the
same as notmuch-search and partly because a "flag" for mbox feels
wrong. I am happy to change it though. Do you have any good naming
suggestions?

> > +
> > +The default is
> > +.B --exclude=true.
> >  
> > -Do not exclude the messages matching search.exclude_tags in the config file.
> >  .RE
> >  
> >  A common use of
> > diff --git a/notmuch-client.h b/notmuch-client.h
> > index f4a62cc..e36148b 100644
> > --- a/notmuch-client.h
> > +++ b/notmuch-client.h
> > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ typedef struct notmuch_show_format {
> >  
> >  typedef struct notmuch_show_params {
> >      notmuch_bool_t entire_thread;
> > +    notmuch_bool_t omit_excluded;
> >      notmuch_bool_t raw;
> >      int part;
> >  #ifdef GMIME_ATLEAST_26
> > diff --git a/notmuch-show.c b/notmuch-show.c
> > index 05d51b2..20d6635 100644
> > --- a/notmuch-show.c
> > +++ b/notmuch-show.c
> > @@ -812,6 +812,7 @@ show_messages (void *ctx,
> >  {
> >      notmuch_message_t *message;
> >      notmuch_bool_t match;
> > +    notmuch_bool_t excluded;
> >      int first_set = 1;
> >      int next_indent;
> >  
> > @@ -830,10 +831,11 @@ show_messages (void *ctx,
> >  	message = notmuch_messages_get (messages);
> >  
> >  	match = notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_MATCH);
> > +	excluded = notmuch_message_get_flag (message, NOTMUCH_MESSAGE_FLAG_EXCLUDED);
> >  
> >  	next_indent = indent;
> >  
> > -	if (match || params->entire_thread) {
> > +	if ((match && (!excluded || !params->omit_excluded)) || params->entire_thread) {
> >  	    show_message (ctx, format, message, indent, params);
> >  	    next_indent = indent + 1;
> >  
> > @@ -974,6 +976,12 @@ enum {
> >      NOTMUCH_FORMAT_RAW
> >  };
> >  
> > +enum {
> > +    EXCLUDE_TRUE,
> > +    EXCLUDE_FALSE,
> > +    EXCLUDE_FLAG,
> > +};
> > +
> >  int
> >  notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >  {
> > @@ -983,10 +991,10 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >      char *query_string;
> >      int opt_index, ret;
> >      const notmuch_show_format_t *format = &format_text;
> > -    notmuch_show_params_t params = { .part = -1 };
> > +    notmuch_show_params_t params = { .part = -1, .omit_excluded = TRUE };
> >      int format_sel = NOTMUCH_FORMAT_NOT_SPECIFIED;
> >      notmuch_bool_t verify = FALSE;
> > -    notmuch_bool_t no_exclude = FALSE;
> > +    int exclude = EXCLUDE_TRUE;
> >  
> >      notmuch_opt_desc_t options[] = {
> >  	{ NOTMUCH_OPT_KEYWORD, &format_sel, "format", 'f',
> > @@ -995,11 +1003,15 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >  				  { "mbox", NOTMUCH_FORMAT_MBOX },
> >  				  { "raw", NOTMUCH_FORMAT_RAW },
> >  				  { 0, 0 } } },
> > +        { NOTMUCH_OPT_KEYWORD, &exclude, "exclude", 'x',
> > +          (notmuch_keyword_t []){ { "true", EXCLUDE_TRUE },
> > +                                  { "false", EXCLUDE_FALSE },
> > +                                  { "flag", EXCLUDE_FLAG },
> > +                                  { 0, 0 } } },
> >  	{ NOTMUCH_OPT_INT, &params.part, "part", 'p', 0 },
> >  	{ NOTMUCH_OPT_BOOLEAN, &params.entire_thread, "entire-thread", 't', 0 },
> >  	{ NOTMUCH_OPT_BOOLEAN, &params.decrypt, "decrypt", 'd', 0 },
> >  	{ NOTMUCH_OPT_BOOLEAN, &verify, "verify", 'v', 0 },
> > -	{ NOTMUCH_OPT_BOOLEAN, &no_exclude, "no-exclude", 'n', 0 },
> >  	{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> >      };
> >  
> > @@ -1088,16 +1100,18 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >  	return 1;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    /* if format=mbox then we can not output excluded messages as
> > -     * there is no way to make the exclude flag available */
> > -    if (format_sel == NOTMUCH_FORMAT_MBOX)
> > -	notmuch_query_set_omit_excluded_messages (query, TRUE);
> > -
> >      /* If a single message is requested we do not use search_excludes. */
> >      if (params.part >= 0)
> >  	ret = do_show_single (ctx, query, format, &params);
> >      else {
> > -	if (!no_exclude) {
> > +	if (format == &format_mbox && exclude == EXCLUDE_FLAG) {
> > +	    /* there is no where to mark flagged messages so fall back on
> 
> s/no where/nowhere/  Also, s/there/There/ for style consistency.
> 
> > +	     * including the excluded messages */
> > +	    fprintf (stderr, "Cannot flag excluded messages with format=mbox: fall back on just including them\n");
> 
> This is a bit verbose.  How about just "Warning: mbox cannot flag
> excluded messages"?  Flag already means that the messages should be
> included, so this message states exactly what mbox isn't doing that
> you might expect it to.

I like this and will change to it.

> > +	    exclude = EXCLUDE_FALSE;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (exclude != EXCLUDE_FALSE) {
> >  	    const char **search_exclude_tags;
> >  	    size_t search_exclude_tags_length;
> >  	    unsigned int i;
> > @@ -1106,7 +1120,12 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))
> >  		(config, &search_exclude_tags_length);
> >  	    for (i = 0; i < search_exclude_tags_length; i++)
> >  		notmuch_query_add_tag_exclude (query, search_exclude_tags[i]);
> > +	    if (exclude == EXCLUDE_FLAG) {
> > +		notmuch_query_set_omit_excluded_messages(query, FALSE);
> > +		params.omit_excluded = FALSE;
> > +	    }
> >  	}
> > +
> >  	ret = do_show (ctx, query, format, &params);
> >      }
> >  

Thanks

Mark


More information about the notmuch mailing list