[PATCH 0/2] A bug in the exclude code
Jameson Graef Rollins
jrollins at finestructure.net
Tue Mar 13 10:39:58 PDT 2012
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:07:49 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to emphasise the bug is already present in current master (just
> better hidden because of the defaults). Hence this pair of patches
> (unlike the first one I sent privately) are to current master rather
> than to the exclude the series (though they apply there to to modulo the
> minor change you mention).
Ok, I see. I think we really need to see the rest of that patch series
applied to master, though, so if you could send a version compatible
with , and in-reply-to , that would awesome.
Thanks again, Mark.
 id:"1330779918-28024-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the notmuch