[rfc] autotools compatibility and Hurd as platform
David Bremner
david at tethera.net
Sun Mar 4 18:20:39 PST 2012
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:40:21 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> The patch reuses config.sub to canonicalize the arguments, but this
> introduces a build dependency on autotools and probably worse, it uses
> autotools internals and the path to config.sub has to be hardcoded.
>
> Since this might be not desirable we might also just drop the code
> that parses the --host and --build options since we're not using them
> anyway.
The second solution sounds better to me. The only issue we might
encounter is dealing with multi-arch installation properly. But I guess
we don't do that now anyway, so no real loss.
d
More information about the notmuch
mailing list