[PATCH] Actually close the xapian database in notmuch_database_close
Justus Winter
4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de
Wed Feb 29 22:59:30 PST 2012
Hi :)
Olly wrote:
>It is hard to say if calling close() is actually useful here from just
>seeing the patch.
Huh? I provided a test case...
Quoting Austin Clements (2012-02-29 23:17:54)
>Quoth Olly Betts on Feb 29 at 9:19 pm:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:48:33AM -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
>> > Quoth Justus Winter on Feb 29 at 10:19 am:
>> > > Formerly the xapian database object was deleted and closed in its
>> > > destructor once the object was garbage collected. Explicitly call
>> > > close() so that the database and the associated lock is released
>> > > immediately.
>> >
>> > Interesting. Is this a bug in Xapian? According to the docs,
>> > ~Database is supposed to close the database (if there are no other
>> > copies, which there shouldn't be), so this should be redundant with
>> > the delete notmuch->xapian_db a few lines down, but your experience
>> > obviously suggests that it isn't and I can't find the code path in
>> > Xapian that would close it in the destructor.
>>
>> Most Xapian API classes (including Database and WritableDatabase) just
>> hold a reference-counted pointer, and so it's the destructor of the
>> reference-counted object which closes the database. If "PIMPL" means
>> anything to you, that's what we have here.
>>
>> Some other API classes objects (such as PostingIterator) internally hold
>> a reference to the database they are using, so calling close()
>> explicitly is useful if you don't want to have to worry about such
>> objects still existing and holding onto references which keep the
>> database open.
>
>Makes sense. Justus, could you add a comment to your patch explaining
>that we explicitly close the database because there may be other
>objects with references to it that would keep it open?
I thought I did, I'm not a native speaker though, so if you want to
reword my message be my guest ;)
>Also, since close could throw an exception, it should get wrapped in a
>try/catch like flush currently is.
My interpretation of [0] was that Xapian::Database::close() does not
throw any exceptions.
Cheers,
Justus
0: http://xapian.org/docs/apidoc/html/classXapian_1_1Database.html#59f5f8b137723dcaaabdbdccbc0cf1eb
More information about the notmuch
mailing list