[PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

[Dmitry Kurochkin]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter at praet.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner <david at tethera.net> wrote:
> > > On Sun,  5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Changes:
> > > > 
> > > > v4:
> > > > 
> > > > * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I pushed this series.  
> > > 
> > > Maybe this was discussed already, but I think ideally * would apply only
> > > to open messages. So consider that a feature request if someone is
> > > looking for a project.
> > >
> > 
> > How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it currently does),
> > but 'C-u *' only to open messages?  That would make more sense IMHO.
> > 
> > But, conforming to your original request, I've implemented the inverse.
> > 
> 
> I personally do like '*' as is and do not want to change it's behavior.
> Though I am not against adding a prefix argument for it.
> 

Also can you please send new patches (and patch series) in a new
separate thread?  If they are related to another thread, you can add a
reference.  But having multiple patch series with multiple versions in a
single thread is very confusing IMO.

Regards,
  Dmitry

> Regards,
>   Dmitry
> 
> > Patches follow.
> > 
> > 
> > > d
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > notmuch mailing list
> > > notmuch at notmuchmail.org
> > > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
> > 
> > 
> > Peace
> > 
> > -- 
> > Pieter