[PATCH v4] test: emacs: add test for `notmuch-search-operate-all'

[Pieter Praet]

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:13:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pieter.
> 
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:45:50 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter at praet.org> wrote:
> > `notmuch-search-operate-all' (bound to "*") adds and removes tags
> > to/from all messages which match the query used to populate the
> > current search buffer.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Rebased to current master.
> > 
> > Previous versions (chronologically):
> > - id:"1309450108-2793-1-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
> > - id:"1309762318-4530-5-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
> > - id:"1310313335-4159-5-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
> > 
> 
> This looks like a useful patch series.  We definitely need more tests
> for tagging operations in the Emacs UI.  Do you plan to revive it?
> 

Absolutely.  In fact, it's still alive and kicking on a local branch :)


> Note that not so long ago I posted a bunch of tagging-related patches
> [1] that would conflict with this patch at least because of
> `notmuch-search-operate-all' being renamed to `notmuch-search-tag-all'.
> 

Nice series!  Will probably be pushed in the next few days,
so I'll hold off on resubmitting the tests until then.


> > 
> >  test/emacs |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/emacs b/test/emacs
> > index 8ca4c8a..e94ad94 100755
> > --- a/test/emacs
> > +++ b/test/emacs
> > @@ -124,6 +124,25 @@ test_emacs "(notmuch-show \"$os_x_darwin_thread\")
> >  output=$(notmuch search $os_x_darwin_thread | notmuch_search_sanitize)
> >  test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:XXX   2009-11-18 [4/4] Jjgod Jiang, Alexander Botero-Lowry; [notmuch] Mac OS X/Darwin compatibility issues (inbox unread)"
> >  
> > +test_begin_subtest "Add/remove tags to/from all matching messages."
> > +test_emacs '(notmuch-search "tag:inbox AND tags")
> > +	    (notmuch-test-wait)
> > +	    (notmuch-search-operate-all "+matching" "-inbox")
> > +	    (notmuch-search "tag:matching AND NOT tag:inbox")
> > +	    (notmuch-test-wait)
> > +	    (test-output)'
> > +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
> > +  2009-11-18 [3/3]   Adrian Perez de Castro, Keith Packard, Carl Worth  [notmuch] Introducing myself (matching signed unread)
> > +  2009-11-18 [1/3]   Carl Worth, Israel Herraiz, Keith Packard       [notmuch] New to the list (inbox matching unread)
> > +  2009-11-18 [2/2]   Keith Packard, Carl Worth    [notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags (matching unread)
> > +  2009-11-18 [1/2]   Keith Packard, Alexander Botero-Lowry    [notmuch] [PATCH] Create a default notmuch-show-hook that highlights URLs and uses word-wrap (inbox matching unread)
> > +  2009-11-18 [1/1]   Jan Janak            [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch new: Support for conversion of spool subdirectories into tags (matching unread)
> > +  2009-11-18 [1/1]   Stewart Smith        [notmuch] [PATCH] Fix linking with gcc to use g++ to link in C++ libs. (matching unread)
> > +  2009-11-17 [1/2]   Ingmar Vanhassel, Carl Worth  [notmuch] [PATCH] Typsos (inbox matching unread)
> > +End of search results.
> > +EOF
> > +test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED
> 
> I am worried that this test would break because of changes in other
> tests.  E.g. if a new test adds a new message which matches "tag:inbox
> AND tags", this test would have to be updated.  I think we should avoid
> this.  I see the following options here:
> 
> * Search for messages which are less likely to change, e.g. "from:carl".
> 
> * Rework the test to avoid using any fixed expected results, e.g.:
> 
>   - count all messages with tag:inbox
> 
>   - remove inbox tag, add some other distinct tag for all messages with
>     tag:inbox
> 
>   - count all messages with tag:inbox again, check that it is 0
> 
>   - add the inbox tag back, remove the previously added tag, check the
>     message count
> 
> I like the latter approach because it does not compare Emacs UI output
> and hence would not break when that output changes.  What do you think?
> 
> Also, we should leave notmuch db in the same state as it was before the
> test if possible.
> 

Good point(s)!

How about this:

  #+begin_src sh
    test_begin_subtest "Add/remove tags to/from all matching messages."
    expected=$(notmuch count from:cworth AND tag:inbox)
    test "${expected}" == "0" && expected="Need more matches!" # prevent false positives
    test_emacs "(notmuch-search \"from:cworth AND tag:inbox\")
            (notmuch-test-wait)
            (notmuch-search-operate-all \"+matching\" \"-inbox\")"
    output=$(notmuch count from:cworth AND tag:matching AND NOT tag:inbox)
    notmuch tag -matching +inbox -- from:cworth AND tag:matching AND NOT tag:inbox # restore db state!
    test_expect_equal "$output" "$expected"
  #+end_src


> Regards,
>   Dmitry
> 
> [1] id:"1327901644-15799-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com"
> 
> > +
> >  test_begin_subtest "Message with .. in Message-Id:"
> >  add_message [id]=123..456 at example '[subject]="Message with .. in Message-Id"'
> >  test_emacs '(notmuch-search "id:\"123..456 at example\"")
> > -- 
> > 1.7.8.1
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch at notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Peace

-- 
Pieter