[PATCH] emacs: Quote MML tags in replies
Pieter Praet
pieter at praet.org
Thu Jan 19 15:21:08 PST 2012
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:56:16 -0500, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:48:42 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon at MIT.EDU> wrote:
> > Did you consider using point-max instead of mark? IIRC, that mark was
> > very recently introduced which, perhaps irrationally, makes it seem
> > less future-proof to me.
>
> Well, if the patch goes in and someone changes the code so that it no
> longer sets the mark (in the same way), they will be the one breaking
> stuff, and they’ll have to come up with the fix themself. [...]
True that.
> [...] Using point-max
> would include the signature in the quoting as well. It would probably be
> fairly odd to want to put an MML tag in one’s signature, but that doesn’t
> mean that we should break that usage.
>
So, would I be right to assume MML tags in signatures are never
evaluated to begin with? Otherwise, there would still be a security
hole, no?
> >
> > >
> > > (defun notmuch-mua-forward-message ()
> > > (message-forward)
> >
> > Speaking of future-proofing, it would be good to have a test.
>
> It would. ;) I’ll work on one.
>
Thanks!
These might save you some time:
id:"1310313335-4159-1-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
> --
> Aaron Ecay
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch at notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Peace
--
Pieter
More information about the notmuch
mailing list