[PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions

[Jameson Graef Rollins]

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:52:52 +0000, David Edmondson <dme at dme.org> wrote:
> I agree that as long as no keys are pre-bound it will make little
> difference. That just transfers the discussion to the thread about
> adding the bindings, which seems silly.

I think that's ok.  The tag exclusion is in, which is great.  The
next question, of whether we should setup excludes by default, is
intimately related to whether or not we support key bindings to add
those tags.  So I think it's fine to transfer the rest of this
discussion to that thread.

jamie.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120118/fa579212/attachment.pgp>