[PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address scanning functions

[David Edmondson]

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Since this patches got in, I have yet to send a single email to the
> address(es) I intend to :( I am really used to the bindings and this
> change is a pain.  From IRC discussion, it seems like I am not alone
> here.
> 
> There was a proposal to change reply bindings to 'ra' and 'rs'.  When
> 'r' is pressed an appropriate help message can be given in the
> minibuffer.  I like this proposal.  What do others think?
> 
> If others like it, how about reverting to the old bindings until the new
> ones are implemented?

I'm inclined to push on for a while and see if it sticks. Previous
experience with this kind of change suggests that it takes a week or so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120116/06824ed7/attachment.pgp>