[PATCH 1/2] uncrustify.cfg: initial support for notmuch coding style

[Austin Clements]

Quoth David Bremner on Jan 10 at  8:07 am:
> In an ideal situation, running uncrustify on notmuch code would be
> NOP; currently this is not true for all files because 1) the
> configuration is not perfect 2) the coding style of notmuch is not
> completely consistent; in particular the treatment of braces after
> e.g. for (_) is not consistent.

Do you have examples of something this gets wrong besides the funny
indentation of notmuch_show_format_t?