[PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only

[Tomi Ollila]

On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:01:44 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch at xvx.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 13:25, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote:
> > Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default
> > in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)?
> >
> > Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by
> > default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)?
> 
> I like both these suggestions.  This would bring the notmuch behavior
> in line with gmail, which is what I tend to expect.

I'd like that. I've already once sent a 'group reply' when I intended
to sent to only one.

+1 for changing 'r' reply sender and 'R' reply all in emacs MUA.

> Mark Walters brings up a good point, that there is a question of what
> to do when the user tries to reply to their own email.  When I do
> this, what I intend is to send another email to the last person I
> emailed in the thread, so I think the suggested heuristic of looking
> at other headers would work.  But, maybe others have a different
> expectation in this case?

Hmm, let's see there was 'Some User(TM)' sending email, and I reply all
to that. If I reply (to sender) to the email I just sent, The recipient
could be 'Some User(TM)' instead of me. Interesting possibility.

Tomi