[PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only

Jameson Graef Rollins jrollins at finestructure.net
Thu Jan 5 12:33:42 PST 2012


On Thu,  5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote:
> Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default
> in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)?
> 
> Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by
> default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)?

I personally like both of these suggestions, and would not be bothered
by the changed default, so I support both of these changes.

Maybe we could just use '--all', instead of '--reply-all'?  The 'reply'
part seems kind of redundant with the command:

notmuch reply --all

vs.

notmuch reply --reply-all

jamie.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120105/632ad7c0/attachment.pgp>


More information about the notmuch mailing list