Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Peter Portante]

Is there a good test suite for notmuch?

I'll take a crack at it using the latest 0.11 sources and see how far I get.

Thanks, -peter

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins <
jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante <
> peter.a.portante at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
> > Fedora 16:
> >
> >     [pportant at frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
> >     Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
> >     CC -O2 debugger.o
> >     In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
> >     notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name
> 'GMimeSignatureValidity'
> >     notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext'
> >     make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1
> >
> > It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove
> > the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and
> > renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.
>
> Hey, Peter.  Unfortunately notmuch is not yet compatible with gmime 2.6.
> gmime 2.5, which is apparently what's in Fedora 16, is the experimental
> release of the 2.6 interface.
>
> Updating notmuch to work with gmime 2.6 has been on the todo list for a
> while now, and it's obviously getting more urgent.  I've been planning
> on looking into it at it as soon as I can, but if anyone else wants to
> take a crack at it, I'll be happy to review patches.
>
> jamie.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120103/6ff83d91/attachment.html>