Patch review/application process

[Philip Hands]

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:42:33 +0200, Daniel Schoepe <daniel at schoepe.org> wrote:
...
> - (Re)try some patch/issue management software: Since patches are easily
>   forgotten if they just float around in several months old mails, it
>   might be prudent to use something to keep track of patches or issues
>   these patches address. I know that the patchwork instance didn't work
>   out so well, partly because it didn't recognize new versions of sent
>   patches. An alternative might be an issue-based system, which would be
>   comfortably usable if it supported discussing issues via mail instead
>   of having to use some web interface. I think this is supported by
>   redmine.

Since the wiki is ikiwiki, it might be worth using the bug tracking
available in ikiwiki:

  http://ikiwiki.info/tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki/

or just create a dedicated instance of ikiwiki just for tracking bugs
(possibly as part of the source repository, so that bugs get carried
around with the source in git, and can be closed with the commit that
fixes them, etc.)

Cheers, Phil
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]    http://www.hands.com/
|-|  HANDS.COM Ltd.                    http://www.uk.debian.org/
|(|  10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London  E18 1NE  ENGLAND
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111102/cffdc1f9/attachment.pgp>