Concerns regarding some library functions

[David Bremner]

On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:51:29 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon at MIT.EDU> wrote:

> Yes.  We could just deal with that (there aren't *that* many API
> consumers).  For binary compatibility, I suppose we could even use
> symbol versioning.

I noticed a similar remark in lib/Makefile.local. But I'm not sure how
this work if the interface of a given library function changed.  Can
someone point me to some more explanation? 

Of course we can always bump the soname of libnotmuch. It isn't that big
of a deal IMHO.

d