[PATCH 2/2] test: use emacsclient(1) for Emacs tests

[Dmitry Kurochkin]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:10:58 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:42:42 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would like to hear what other (Carl in particular) think about this.
> > If the consensus is for your approach, I would be happy to implement
> > it.
> 
> In general, I love the whole series, thanks! I'm looking forward to our
> future, faster test suite.
> 

BTW Carl, while we continue our debate, you may consider applying the
first 9 patches from the series :)

id:"1309236311-2162-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com"

Regards,
  Dmitry

> Even more, I love the constructive dialog that follows the original
> series and the attention being focused on getting things right.
> 
> As for the detail of whether to use emacsclient or Austin's look-alike,
> I don't have a strong attachment to either solution. I do appreciate
> concrete technical things like "robust against recycled PIDs", "more
> robust against leaving daemon's around for some reason", etc.
> 
> Would any of this potentially interfere with my own usage of emacsclient
> and emacs server? I use them regularly and would be quite surprised (and
> likely frustrated) if the test suite got mixed up with my existing emacs
> server (or the other way around). Maybe that's already taken care of
> with either approach? (A quick skim of the emacsclient manual age didn't
> make it obvious to me how emacslcient finds its server.)
> 
> -Carl
> 
> -- 
> carl.d.worth at intel.com
Non-text part: application/pgp-signature