tweaks for handling parts in reply

[Austin Clements]

It's too bad this requires lots of special-casing.  I dug into mutt,
hoping to find some simpler way to choose what to reply to, but all I
found was a far more complicated collection of heuristics (see
mutt_body_handler if you're interested).

Should reply *ever* include a "Non-text part" message?  It certainly
doesn't help the receiver of the reply and presumably the sender will
either notice that a part is missing if they care about it, or
probably miss the Non-text part message anyway if they don't.

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins
<jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:
> This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:"
> lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned.
>
> This patch set is not really related to the series that it is being
> sent in reply to, but it has been worked on top of the message/rfc822
> rework of the multipart test, so it's being sent in reply to that
> message.
>
> jamie.
>
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch at notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
>