[PATCH 2/2] emacs: notmuch-hello: Add "n" and "p" to mod map

[Xavier Maillard]

Hi Pieter,

On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:26:11 +0200, Pieter Praet <pieter at praet.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:48:45 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen <kanru at kanru.info> wrote:
> > Bind "n" to widget-forward and "p" to widget-backward to unify the
> > interface since other notmuch major mode also accept "n" and "p" to
> > navigation.
> > ---
> >  emacs/notmuch-hello.el |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
> > index 6ef03bb..7def241 100644
> > --- a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
> > +++ b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
> > @@ -294,6 +294,8 @@ should be. Returns a cons cell `(tags-per-line width)'."
> >      (define-key map "=" 'notmuch-hello-update)
> >      (define-key map "G" 'notmuch-hello-poll-and-update)
> >      (define-key map (kbd "<C-tab>") 'widget-backward)
> > +    (define-key map "n" 'widget-forward)
> > +    (define-key map "p" 'widget-backward)
> >      (define-key map "m" 'notmuch-mua-mail)
> >      (define-key map "s" 'notmuch-hello-goto-search)
> >      map)
> > -- 
> > 1.7.1
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Sounds logical in theory, but in practice, you'll soon get stuck
> spamming "nnnnnpppnwtf" in the search field.
> 
> That, and TAB/S-TAB feels more natural.

More natural than what exactly ? Anyway, that would not hurt to add 'n'
and 'p' as another way to navigate through widgets in my opinion
(whatsmore that's how customize also works -i.e navigation done both
with TAB/S-TAB and n/p)

/Xavier