signed/encrypted tagging in crypto branch
Jameson Rollins
jrollins at finestructure.net
Sun Mar 6 11:15:00 PST 2011
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:26:46 -0800, Jameson Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:
> Hey, folks. I just pushed a couple of patches to my "crypto" branch [0]
> that add support for auto-tagging of multipart/signed and
> multipart/encrypted messages with the "signed" and "encrypted" tags
> respectively. Only new messages are thus tagged, so a database rebuild
> is required to auto-tag old messages.
So I realized last night, what now seems obvious, that restoring tags
after a notmuch new will override any initial auto tagging. This means
that doing a database rebuild will *not* crypto tag all your old mail if
you then restore tags from a tag dump afterwords.
I'm not sure if there's anything that can be done about this. I think
we either have to have a way to merge tags, or the signed and encrypted
indicators need to exist in a different field in the database. Tags
allow more flexibility in the UIs, but maybe we could just tag based on
a the new database field somehow?
It's not such a big deal that we only get "signed" and "encrypted" from
here forward, but it would be nice to re-tag old messages this way. I
can imagine that something like this will come up again in the future,
and it would be nice if we had a solution. I'm open to suggestions.
jamie.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110306/74b96cc6/attachment.pgp>
More information about the notmuch
mailing list