[PATCH 0/3] composing patches

[Jameson Rollins]

On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:35:17 +0200, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why it's not? The emacs UI is not really doing anything on top of
> 'notmuch reply'. And if it is, it can very well override that value.
> Besides, what about other users (vim)? Why not make the output of
> 'notmuch reply' ready to be dumped to sendmail?

I think this is a reasonable point.  But is there a reason that vim
can't fill in the Message-ID and User-Agent fields?  Presumably it does
when composing new messages, right?

That said, if the pre-filling in those fields will help other user
agents, then I don't see the binary shouldn't do that.  Like you said,
other user agents (like emacs) can change them if they see fit.

> It seems right now there's a lot of reliance on emacs UI, and gnus.

I don't think there's any reliance on gnus.  I certainly don't use it.

jamie.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101210/5d3b7c41/attachment.pgp>