[PATCH 0/9] vim improvements
Carl Worth
cworth at cworth.org
Mon Nov 8 09:57:16 PST 2010
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 14:12:33 +0300, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras at gmail.com> wrote:
> The only controversial one is the really aggressive author cleanup. I
> guess the really ideal thing would be to pass the full author "Foo Bar
> <foo.bar at mail.com>", and let UI's deal with the format (possibly
> configurable by the user).
Yes. Personally, I'd prefer first names rather than portions of the
email address. So I don't want to commit a change that takes us in the
wrong direction, (giving less information to the frontends to work
with).
The rest of your vim patches seem totally unobjectionable to me, (but
mostly only because I don't use that frontend). But I am happy to see
someone hacking on it.
So I'll merge these now. And since Bart didn't reply at all in all this
time, Felipe, would you like access to push changes directly to the vim
code? Since we're hosting that code in the notmuch repository I think we
need to have an interested maintainer with the ability to maintain it,
(so that future improvements don't sit idle for months).
I'll send instructions for setting you up with access like that if you'd
like to do that kind of maintenance.
-Carl
--
carl.d.worth at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101108/85a2869e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the notmuch
mailing list