[notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Ben Gamari <bgamari at gmail.com> [2010.02.18.1519 +1300]:
> > So retagging is really just writing a new tree with a modified list
> > of references.
> > 
> Certainly, however if you have a large tag (>100,000 messages), this
> list of reference could easily be tens of megabytes. For this reason, it
> seems like the added overhead of nesting trees would be well worth it.

True — iff we find a way to enumerate trees referencing a given
blob or tree so that we can walk up the hierarchy. I could look
right now, but I am about to cross half of the globe tomorrow, so
I have other things I should rather be doing. Sorry.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"men always want to be a woman's first love.
 women have a more subtle instinct:
 what they like is to be a man's last romance."
                                                        -- oscar wilde
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/348ab02a/attachment.pgp>