<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Thanks everyone for the feedback.<br><br></div>I wasn't aware it could be done on the command line, on the other hand I really wanted to experiment and see how much <span style class="">notmuch</span> was hackable with Emacs Lisp.<br>
<br><br></div>I'll probably explore the command line option for a next version.<br><br></div>For me it's important that muted thread stay in the inbox, but get their read tag removed, since I may want to read them later if a colleague points to me the thread I ignored.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:27 PM, David Bremner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david@tethera.net" target="_blank">david@tethera.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">Amadeusz Żołnowski <<a href="mailto:aidecoe@aidecoe.name">aidecoe@aidecoe.name</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
><br>
> The question is: should exclude_tags be used in context of killed/mute?<br>
> This is just for skipping „inbox”, not for hiding them in all search<br>
> results - at least IMHO.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>For me I definitely want a muted thread to disappear in all searches. I<br>
have at least three "inboxes" with sometimes overlapping content. But<br>
yeah, if you don't want that, then you need some other approach than<br>
exclude_tags. If I understand correctly, what you ask for also sounds<br>
easily scriptable:<br>
<br>
% notmuch tag -inbox +muted -- $(notmuch search --output=threads tag:muted)<br>
<br>
and of course that can be done in a post-new script or equivalent.<br>
<br>
d<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
notmuch mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org">notmuch@notmuchmail.org</a><br>
<a href="http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch" target="_blank">http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>