priorities for 0.13

Tomi Ollila tomi.ollila at
Wed Apr 25 10:02:22 PDT 2012

On Wed, Apr 25 2012, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch at> wrote:

> Hi David,
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:31, David Bremner <david at> wrote:
>> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of
>> May.  What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and
>> pushed for 0.13?
> I would like to get the HTML reply series [1] in before 0.13, since
> otherwise the reply stuff that's already pushed can cause some ugly
> (but not buggy) behavior, quoting raw HTML in reply. There's been one
> review, and it's a small patch, but I think it could use another set
> of eyes.
> [1] id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch at"

Yes I agree on this -- I've been hand-adding text from html-only email
to my reply buffers for now. Is there anything to comment on Mark's 
thoughts there ?

I browsed through ; personally I'd like to
see id:"1327996914-9644-3-git-send-email-dme at".

Also the 'Maybe Ready' queue looks good (as it should be). And the few
(trivial) patches Austin is going to send (and we have reviewed) that
are good to get before SONAME change are good to have.

> -- Adam


More information about the notmuch mailing list