[PATCH] Build-Depend on libgmime-2.6-dev | libgmime2.4-dev
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Fri Feb 10 13:02:57 PST 2012
On 02/10/2012 03:57 PM, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> For the time being, should the order be:
> - libgmime-2.4-dev,
> + libgmime-2.4-dev | libgmime-2.6-dev,
2.6 is available and functional in unstable. I think we should prefer 2.6.
This will enable (and encourage) us to approach S/MIME support too
(which isn't offered in 2.4), as well as helping flush out any concerns
with 2.6. Leaving 2.4-dev as an optional b-d will make backporting
simpler, but i think we should try to use (and support) upstream's
stable gmime branch.
More information about the notmuch